Skip to main content

Week 6 - BioTech + Art


In this week’s lecture, Dr. Vesna discussed biotechnology and art; the sensitivity around this collaboration was what stood out to me. Despite the sensitivity, I do believe that art and biotechnology is a great and healthy collaboration.





There was sensitivity around the ethics of art interfering with science because genetic engineering can be perceived as a “mix of nature and culture” (Levy 8). I actually had ‘oh!’ and ‘ew!’ and ‘wow!’ reactions towards the images used in the lecture videos, a lot more than the previous lectures. Before I could complain any more, there’s an artist mentioned in Dr. Vesna’s lecture this week that has already addressed it.

“The lack of a common global aesthetic and a historical track record of bad taste (i.e., ethnic cleansing, line dancing, liposuction, most painting) provides me with the impetus, the eclectic fecundity to guarantee iconoclasm in a situation which could all too easily lead to the erasure of the same,” - Adam Zaretsky

The quote helped me develop an understanding of the purpose behind the art form that mixes with science. The purpose is for people to feel less uncomfortable around things that are coexisting around them already but no visually ready. Even the food we consume has biotechnology behind it!

In the researches that study biotechnology, the whole ethics issue is frequently brought up. I personally believe that art and biotechnology is a great collaboration because it can render good outcomes such as delivering sustainable food options for the poor (Persley 2). Art acts as a medium to reach out and appeal to the population who are already well economically. So together, this collaboration is one that will benefit everyone.

The issue of ethics is definitely a legitimate problem, but even science in Europe that tends to take a more scientific approach, they implement preliminary sessions to ensure there are not macroscopic societal issues (Serratosa & Simone 96). Thus it really does seem like the sensitivity is something more bureaucratic than anything else.

Furthering my argument for the collaboration between art and biotechnology, I believe it is important to always work together and likewise, the saying, “two heads are better than one”, different minds help bring different ideas and perspective to the table which supports “creativity breed creativity” (Kelty 5).
  
SOURCES:

Cabañas, Marcos. “César Marcos Cabañas.” EComercio Agrario, Redacción ECA Http://Ecomercioagrario.com/Wp-Content/Uploads/2015/09/logo1.Png, 2 June 2016, ecomercioagrario.com/en/pec-events/the-role-of-agricultural-biotechnology-in-food-security/.


“CUT/PASTE/GROW: The Beautiful Abominations of Bio Art.” ANIMAL, 26 Mar. 2013, animalnewyork.com/2013/beautiful-abominations-an-exploration-of-bio-art-at-observatory/.

De Simone, F., and J. Serratosa. "Biotechnology, animal health and animal welfare within the framework of European Union legislation." Revue scientifique et technique-Office international des épizooties 24.1 (2005): 89-99.

Kelty, Chris. “meanings of participation: Outlaw Biology?” BioTech + Art. Desma 9, UCLA, 2018.

Levy, Ellen K. "Defining Life: Artists Challenge Conventional Classifications." (2007).

Persley, Gabrielle Josephine. Biotechnology for developing-country agriculture: problems and opportunities. No. 2. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 1999.

Staff, TakePart. “12 Genetically Engineered Animals That Changed Modern Science.” TakePart, 6 Mar. 2016, www.takepart.com/photos/genetically-engineered-mosquitos-fight-zika-see-12-other-animals-modified-lab/index.html.

Vesna, Victoria. “5 BioArt pt3” BioTech + Art. Desma 9, 13 May. 2018, Los Angeles, University of California, Los Angeles, https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=3EpD3np1S2g

Comments

  1. AMMay 16, 2018 at 2:59 PM

    Hi Galen,

    I find it interesting how you mentioned the idea of foods being considered bioart when they are genetically modified and processed. A lot of the foods if not all of it we eat have been altered in some way shape or form. I like how you also mentioned the controversy between nature and culture.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Event 2 - Tangent Contemporary Art Gallery

I visited the Tangent Contemporary Art Gallery in downtown San Francisco. One of their ‘reverspective’ window pieces caught my eye and inspired me to further explore the type of art in their gallery. From the curator, I learned that stimulus like light, and environment, wall color, may influence greatly how the art is perceived. In my previous psychology class on sensation and perception,   different visual cues can alter the focal image, thus it makes sense that the environment is very important and needs to be considered for a ‘reverspective’ art piece. Additionally, there is research that supports the fact that the absence of specific painted cues can affect how the art piece is perceived (Papathomas 525). This art exhibit inspired me to make lots of connection my major of psychobiology. The concept of binocular cues is important in viewing the art at this gallery. If I closed one eye, the perceived image will lose the aspect of depth. Binocular
Post a Comment
Read more

Event 1 - Acoustical Visions, Bill Fontana

Bill Fontana's artistic vision In this presentation, Bill Fontana proposes his vision of art and how it was during certain state of minds, or moments, when he feels musical, that sounds around him also becomes musical (Fontana 1978). As a science student, I initially imagined that being like my ‘Aha! moment’, but as his presentation went on, it changed. Fort Mason in San Francisco, a presentation slide from Bill Fontana One of Fontana’s early project took place in San Francisco, which is also my home! He recorded the sounds of fog horns at Fort Mason, in San Francisco. In this project, Fontana approaches the sounds of the fog horns as a structure that allows sound to bring together the real time between different spaces. During the presentation, I felt conflicted because I was not sure how real time and different spaces could be connected through sound, since sound travelled at a set speed, 343 meters per second, people at different locations would e
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 7 - Neuroscience + Art

This week we tackled the collaboration between neuroscience and art. As a psychobiology major, Ramon y Cajal is often mentioned in my psychology classes for the technique of staining cells. The idea of neuroscience and art allowed me to develop a better understanding of my presence and renders a reflective aura that makes me see my own life through a more artistic lens.  Consciousness is an idea prefaced by Dr. Vesna, and I believe the idea of brainbow, allowing us to see the neuron in the brain is a step towards "expanding our consciousness" (Vesna). To better the understanding of our body is one that can help us better our lifestyle. I believe this idea that machines might take over the world is similar to the whole issue with guns. It is up to us, based on policy and regulation on how involved we want machines to be for our society. Consciousness can be furthered evaluated through the idea of a "modern man". In the abstract text by Carl Jung, he states
Post a Comment
Read more